Getting Volunteers To Turn In Their Data
Hi folks-
I had a local coordinator for Wisconsin's Water Action Volunteers' stream monitoring program ask me if I had any tips for how to get people to turn in data that they are collecting. He knows people are monitoring, but turning in their data to him doesn't seem to be a priority for them. We currently have an online database where most volunteers submit their data to a local coordinator who then enters it online. We're working to have volunteers be able to enter their own data, but we haven't quite gotten there yet. I figured I'd see what suggestions you all might have to entice people to turn their data in.
Thanks!
Kris
Kris Stepenuck
WI Volunteer Stream Monitoring Coordinator and staff on Volunteer Water Monitoring National Facilitation Project
UW-Extension and WI Department of Natural Resources
210 Hiram Smith Hall
1545 Observatory Drive
Madison, WI 53706-1289
Phone: 608-265-3887
Fax: 608-262-2031
http://clean-water.uwex.edu/wav
http://www.usawaterquality.org/volunteer
Responses
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 4:14 PM
To: Stepenuck, Kris F.
Subject: RE: getting people to give you their data
Hi Kris,
I usually threaten them with the d-frame net!!
I think the big thing is to keep them up to date on your overall efforts. In other words, by praising them all for their efforts, those that have been lagging must feel guilty and always send their data in shortly after such a message. I also mention that the data they collect is indeed useful. Maybe not right now but as the database grows, we may see some significant trends.
If I have not seen or heard from a monitor I will usually call them and ask how things are going and whether or not they are still monitoring. Sometimes they need a little encouragement to regenerate the interest. I really believe coordinators are salespeople. It is up to us to continue to stay in contact and sell our program. If the end result is getting good quality data into the system, then we have succeeded. Everyone's personality is different. My whole pitch starts with how much I appreciate
their efforts and getting them to want to continue doing the monitoring. Some are much more reliable than others. Thats just a fact of life in general.
I am not sure whether this helps or is just an editorial on my behalf.
Good Luck
Pete
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 4:23 PM
To: Stepenuck, Kris F.
Subject: Re: getting people to give you their data
Kris,
We have two methods people use. Either e-mail or paper. Peggy provided paper copies and addressed envelopes at the training so it would be easy for people to mail them. I have a template some people us via e-mail, others write it as a narrative. I prefer the template because I have it laid out so it's easy to enter data into your database.
Dave

Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 14:55:00 -0400
From: "Andersen, Karen" <KAnderse@su.edu>
Subject: RE: [volmonitor] Getting volunteers to turn data in
Hi Kris;
My name is Karen Andersen. I am the Laboratory/Program Director for the Friends of the Shenandoah River (FOSR) located in Virginia. The FOSR is a non-profit scientific organization dedicated to the preservation and restoration of the aquatic environment of the Shenandoah River and its tributaries. The FOSR has the only citizen volunteer water quality monitoring program and water quality analysis laboratory certified by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality in the state. The water quality parameters the waters are monitored for include; Ammonia, Ortho Phosphate, Nitrite-Nitrate, dissolved oxygen, pH, temperature, turbidity and E. coli (using the coliscan easy gel method). This effort is accomplished in cooperation with seven volunteer citizen monitoring organizations throughout the watershed and is recognized as the premier citizen volunteer water quality monitoring program in Virginia. Manned by over 100 volunteer monitors, water samples are collected twice a month throughout the year at more than 130 sites covering over 730 miles of river and tributary streams. The FOSR has an established "Volunteer Water Monitoring and Water Quality Analysis Quality Assurance Project Plan". Included in this plan is a training and certification program for the volunteer water monitors.
Does your group have an established set of protocols for training, water monitoring and data recording, submission and chain of custody for the volunteers?
Is this a new position for you? Not to long ago a job announcement for a Watershed Coordinator position out there in Madison Wisconsin come across my desk. It was kind of funny because about the same time my daughter got accepted to the University of Wisconsin at Madison. I told her was going to follow her out to Madison. She did not think it was so funny.
Karen Andersen
Program/Laboratory Director
Friends of the Shenandoah River
1460 University Drive
Winchester, VA 22601
(540) 665-1286
kanderse@su.edu

Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 15:05:22 -0500
From: Jackson.Peter@epamail.epa.gov
Subject: Re: [volmonitor] Getting volunteers to turn data in
Hi Kris,
Boy - good question! I am trying to recall what we did at IL EcoWatch.
You may already be doing some of these. Let's see...the first thing is
to have a "firm" deadline that is widely- and frequently-publicized. By
"firm", I mean you talk a tough game but in reality you accept any
(quality) data that come in! Then, we used to make a round of calls for
people who were due to monitor but had not submitted by the deadline.
Next, we used to use the "guilt" method - we would have a year-end
volunteer appreciation event (we actually used to have several
throughout the state but cut back to one or two statewide due to budget
constraints in later years). At these events we would have food,
speakers, awards etc. We also sent letters to let people know how
valuable their data are. Another thing was to make data submission as
easy as possible. We had online data entry available to the volunteers
but still required them to send hard copy as backup (to verify the data
etc). In addition, since they had to submit their macroinvertebrate
samples in the case of RiverWatch (for verification), they had to send
those in or drop them off. So we had places all around the state where
they could drop off their data sheets and bug samples. State parks and
community colleges, for instance. Then we would pick up the samples. I
forget how many drop-off sites we had, it must have been 25-30. (We
would monitor how many samples each site received to determine the best
places to have these pick=up stations.)
In sum, we did all of the above. We still didn't get 'em all, but we
came close. Hope this helps! It is easier said than done, that's for
sure!
Pete Jackson
USEPA

Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 15:20:46 -0500
From: "Sovell, Laurie" <Laurie.Sovell@state.mn.us>
Subject: RE: [volmonitor] Getting volunteers to turn data in
Kris,
The ideas you've received so far line up with what we do in Minnesota -
have a firm deadline, state it often, send a reminder letter to those
who haven't submitted data by a certain date, reward those who do submit
data.
Two others come to mind:
1) Let people know that their data will not be included in a summary
report (if one is generated) unless it is submitted by a certain "drop-dead" date.
2) If volunteers submit hard-copy data, provide a metered,
self-addressed envelope along with program materials at the beginning of
the season, so it's easy for folks to send completed forms back to you.
Laurie
Laurie Sovell
Coordinator, Citizen Stream-Monitoring Program
MN Pollution Control Agency
520 Lafayette Rd. N.
St. Paul, MN 55155
651/296-7187 (phone)
651/297-8324 (fax)
laurie.sovell@pca.state.mn.us
http://www.pca.state.mn.us/water/csmp.html

Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 17:05:24 -0400
From: Tracie Beasley <tracie@crwc.org>
Subject: RE: [volmonitor] Getting volunteers to turn data in
We are currently using paper forms. If you choose to do this, make sure your
teams have easy access to self-addressed stamped envelopes (We put them in
our stream monitoring kits). I've had 100% success over 3 seasons.
Also, make sure there is a team coordinator that is the responsible person
for monitoring and make this responsibility clear. Good luck.
Tracie Beasley
Stewardship Director
Clinton River Watershed Council
101 Main St., Suite 100
Rochester, MI 48307
Phone 248-601-0606
Fax 248-601-1280
www.crwc.org

Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 16:12:19 -0500
From: Tim Rielly <Tim.Rielly@mdc.mo.gov>
Subject: Re: [volmonitor] Getting volunteers to turn data in
I think "entice" is the key word, I'll try to make this short. The Missouri Stream Team Program offers incentives to volunteers who turn in water quality data and let us know any other activities they have been doing such as litter pick-ups or advocacy. We have an activity report that can be sent in as a hard copy or submitted electronically to the program. If they fill out this activity report they can request "thank you items" such as Stream Team t-shirts, lapel pins, temporary tattoos, etc for their efforts. They can also enter for an activity prize drawing which may be a large item such as a canoe or a "youth group prize", which may be a pizza party. We use this activity reporting system to track activities over the year. Even though we are fortunate enough to be well funded by the sponsoring agencies and by fund raising, this system is still not perfect. We know that a large percentage of volunteers do litter pick-ups and do not ever report them. Or, they may collect water quality data and not turn it in for two or three years, if ever. I know its more work but you might try looking for local sponsors to donate prizes for prize drawings, on say a quarterly basis. Its worth a shot, offering an incentive or "carrot" does seem to help.
Good luck, we all feel your pain!
Tim Rielly
Volunteer Monitoring Coordinator
Missouri Department of Conservation
573-751-4115 ext. 3166
He also responded:
I always tell people what works for us may not work for you, different programs have different focuses. We are up to 3119 Stream Teams with about 55,00 to 60,000 members. Tracking what they do is a pain in the neck and is not a healthy job for a compulsive person. Incentives do help to get them to turn in their activities but it will never be perfect

Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 16:25:13 -0500
From: Jackson.Peter@epamail.epa.gov
Subject: Re: [volmonitor] Getting volunteers to turn data in
I agree with Tim and others that "enticing" volunteers with tee-shirts
etc is effective if you have the budget. They love the tee-shirts, plus
it's built-in advertising.
Pete Jackson
USEPA Region 5

Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 13:58:05 -0600
From: "Horn, Barb" <Barb.Horn@state.co.us>
Subject: RE: [volmonitor] Getting volunteers to turn data in
Kris-
For us getting data turned in is part of the training and an informal
agreement the volunteer signs. We reclaim equipment if a volunteer does
not meet our agreed upon 12 performance criteria. Folks can enter data
on line and we include it as one of the steps in
sampling-prep,collection, analyses, data entry, ship samples if
relevant. We stress that if this whole continuum is not followed we
cannot achieve our goals of protecting our streams. But we work hard up
front in the training to make sure the volunteers know why we need the
data and also why they are doing the sampling and that we can only
succeed together. We have tried incentives for those that do succeed,
most of them tell us it is not important or relevant because that is not
why they are sampling. If it was important to them we would do more of
it, but we ask each volunteer how they would like to be rewarded and why
they are doing this, and we turn away volunteers that don't have a
common goal with us. We have volunteers sign an annual contract, that
was their idea, that gives them a chance to quit and us a way to know
exactly every year who is going to be committed and active..so we can
look for replacements in areas to keep the data collection going. Good
luck.

>>> Chris Riggert 07/20/06 10:20 AM >>>
Hi Kris!
Hope all is going well further north...hope it isn't as hot as it is here this week (triple digits actual heat w/ index of around 120...I need to change my latitude or my altitude!)
We have had similar experiences in getting our volunteers to turn in activities in general (mainly litter pick-up events, letter writing, etc.). We estimated that last year we had approximately $2.4 million in volunteer effort...but that is based on just what is reported. Like the coordinator you mentioned, we know there is more stuff they are doing and not reporting.
However, I believe we have actually been fairly successful in having our volunteers turn in their data. I believe this is for a couple of reasons.
--> The first is that the volunteers are extremely dedicated and take ownership in their adopted site and stream. They really want to see their data posted on the Missouri Stream Team website. We also digitize their sampling location on an interactive mapping page as well. So they can find their site, click on it and see the data they collected.
--> The second is that we tell them up-front during the training sessions that their data gets used by local, county and state agencies and groups(particularly our Level 2 and 3 data).
--> Finally, we offer a "carrot." Conducting and submitting WQM data is a Stream Team activity. They can get free "stuff" for volunteering their time on behalf of our stream resources (mainly t-shirts, mugs, key chains, etc.). Additionally they can be entered into a quarterly drawing for larger prizes (such as canoes, reference books, microscopes, camping equipment, etc.). I know this may not be an option for other volunteer groups across the nation. However, we have had pretty good luck in getting companies to donate larger items or gift cards (then we purchase the items) for the drawings.
I hope this helps!
Chris

From: Kris Stepenuck [mailto:kris.stepenuck@ces.uwex.edu]
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 3:44 PM
To: Horn, Barb
Subject: RE: [volmonitor] Getting volunteers to turn data in
Hi Barb-
Hm, an annual contract. That's intriguing. Are your data used by the
state or for management purposes? I ask because our entry level - which was our only level until recently - is eductional, so it makes it more
difficult to give a reason we need the information- though now with our
upper levels of data use a contract makes a lot of sense. Do you have
an
e-copy of the contract that you could send me?
Thanks so much!
Kris

Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 17:13:24 -0600
From: "Horn, Barb" <Barb.Horn@state.co.us>
Subject: RE: [volmonitor] Getting volunteers to turn data in
I will attach our MOU. We do use the data for triennial reviews, 303d
listing and other CWA processes, most of our volunteers do it for
ecducation and the fact that we do something w/ it--they understand that
we need x amount from them for them to have an educational
experience..in otherwords we both have to lay out our expecatations and
give to get---if you aren't getting your needs met then it is likely
they are not either and there needs to be some different sort of
commitment and FU process. We have to reclaim the equipment and turn it
around to serve the numbers we do w/ budgets, folks understand that
others are waiting in line (even if they aren't literally)--we create a
demand (and perhaps a larger illusion of one, we know there are numerous
folks who will do this work even if we haven't met them yet--it frees us
up to serve those that are performing w/ a high quality service vs using
our time to track down semi-performers... We chose not to have a tiered
program but to get the same quality data from everyone who participates
so we can make statewide statements about the results in each basin
because everyone is doing the same thing ...call me if you want any more
info and good luck.
We ask folks to commit to the 12 performance criteria..if they do, they
are automatically in program next year. If not, if we have to cut folks
those that perform are in above those that don't but tells us who are
above those who don't perform and don't tell us. They have to commit do
sample one station for one year each month for field parameters and
metals, 2/yr for nutrients, 1/yr for bugs and physhab and then other
qaqc type of criteria. We do the analyses for metals and nutrients and
have a taxonomist to bug id---all so we can use data at health dept. The
value of our volunteers is that they are in the field and we aren't.
Nothing is perfect, but we are 15 years into it and this has served us
well. We now have 2 contracts, one for schools and one for watershed
groups that tend to have more goals than schools.
WSGContract2005.pdf
Contract2006.pdf
Barb Horn
Biologist, Colorado Division of Wildlife
151 E. 16th Ave., Durango, CO 81301
vc: 970/382-6667 fx: 970/247-4785

Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 08:48:02 -0500
From: Chris Riggert <Chris.Riggert@mdc.mo.gov>
Subject: Re: [CSREESVolMon] Getting volunteers to turn data in
Hi Kris,
Paul also pointed out to me that we require the volunteers to submit invertebrate and visual survey data before coming to the next level of training (where they get the chemical "stuff").
We used to teach the equivalent of our Introduction and Level 1 classes as one workshop. People's brains were too full, they were overwhelmed, and we weren't getting the return for providing them with ALL of the equipment up front. We have seen a greater return by having them attend the Introduction workshop and just do the bugs and visual survey to get an idea of what kind of commitment they are getting themselves into. This has also saved us quite a bit of funds b/c those that realize it is a bit too much time, etc. don't come to the next level of training, so we are better able to utilize our monies providing kits to a greater percentage of people that will actually use it and turn in their data to us.
If you have any other questions, please do not hesitate to give either Tim or myself a shout!
Chris
Christopher M. Riggert
Fisheries Biologist - Stream Unit
Missouri Department of Conservation
2901 W. Truman Blvd.
Jefferson City, MO 65109
Phone: (573) 522-4115 ext. 3167
Fax: (573) 526-0990
Chris.Riggert@mdc.mo.gov

Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 13:41:00 -0500
From: William Deutsch <deutswg@auburn.edu>
Subject: Re: [CSREESVolMon] Getting volunteers to turn data in
Hi Kris,
In AWW, we replace every monitor's chemical reagents for free, if they
submit at least nine months of data per year. That gets the forms coming in! For less than nine months, we replace broken glassware and
thermometers but the monitor or group has to purchase the reagents. The
online data entry feature will also appeal to many volunteers and about
80% of our data comes in that way now.
It's amazing to me how some monitors will test a site for months
without all that much concern about data submission and use. It shows
how we coordinators sometimes prioritze things differently than the
volunteers.

From: Dana Oleskiewicz <oleskiewicz.1@osu.edu>
Subject: Re: [CSREESVolMon] Getting volunteers to turn data in
To: Kris Stepenuck <kris.stepenuck@ces.uwex.edu>
Competition often is an incentive....first to submit, greatest number of data, etc...

Other unique answers received:
Bribe them with beer.
Beatings?
Send out Guido & Rocky and knocks some heads! -Tony Soprano
================================================================================
Updated
Tuesday, 07-Oct-2008 17:10:50 CDT
|